Another way the Age of Attention Deficit may affect what we do.

Yesterday, we talked about how the shorter attention spans of our audience may have an effect on the type of theater that is created.

But there’s another, less obvious effect that our next generation’s need for more stimuli may have on what we do.

And that is . . .

Will there be anyone that wants to do it?

Actors in the theater have one of the most challenging jobs in the arts.  Not only do they have to create their art live in front of an audience (imagine if a painter or novelist had to create their work with 1,000 people watching), they also have to do it up to eight times a week.

And it has to be the same (or close to) every single night.  They can’t deviate too much from where they were directed, not only for artistic reasons, but also out of respect for their other actors on stage, and also for safety.  In a big musical, you best not be a couple of paces off your mark or you may just be wearing a giant piece of scenery as a headdress.

Acting is an artistic assembly line gig.  (Listen to Broadway star Steven Pasquale talk about that in his podcast here.)

So . . . if we know that the next set of actors coming up through the ranks may have even less of an attention span than the pesky whipper-snapper set . . . will those actors even want to work in the theater, which requires them to do the exact same thing, night after night?  And if they do choose to act in the theater, will they want to jump ship from show to show more quickly than they are now?

We already know that the pesky whipper-snappers are job-jumpers, with a Gallup Poll indicating that they are three times more likely to leave a gig than non-pesky whipper-snappers.  And I believe we’re already seeing the beginning of this low attention span phenomenon affecting the desire to show up for your gig with the rise in absenteeism on Broadway (not to mention the rise in absenteeism in all employment).

Does this mean that we’re going to lose our workforce?

No, of course not.  But this could shrink it for sure.  In film and TV, you only have to do a scene once  (give or take a “take” or two) and then you get to move onto the next and never go back and do it over.  And then, a couple months later, you can move onto a different film.  Oh, and it pays more.  So if you’re wired with a shorter attention span, which one would you prefer?

We’re going to have a harder time getting people to want to act on our stages in twenty years, and it’s going to be harder to keep them on those stages.

As Producers, it’s going to be our responsibility to come up with ways to make what they do even more attractive, in order to guarantee that our audiences are seeing the best actors on the planet.


(Got a comment? I love ‘em, so comment below! Email Subscribers, click here then scroll down to say what’s on your mind!)

– – – – –

Interested in learning more about topics like this? CLICK HERE to join The TheaterMakers Studio, an online community, certification training program, and resource for playwrights, producers, directors, actors, and theater makers of all kinds!

Related Posts


Ken created one of the first Broadway podcasts, recording over 250 episodes over 7 years. It features interviews with A-listers in the theater about how they “made it”, including 2 Pulitzer Prize Winners, 7 Academy Award Winners and 76 Tony Award winners. Notable guests include Pasek & Paul, Kenny Leon, Lynn Ahrens and more.